Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- bibliografie:hvj_en_conclusies [2021/11/12 16:37] – [Z] avdoesum
+++ bibliografie:hvj_en_conclusies [2025/03/07 15:22] (current) – [D] avdoesum
@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 ==C==
 ==D==
+  * [[https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62020CC0141&from=en|Diakonie]] \\ Opinion of Advocate General Medina of 13 January 2022, Case C-141/20, Finanzamt Kiel v Norddeutsche Gesellschaft für Diakonie mbH, ECLI:EU:C:2022:11
+  * [[https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62023CC0060|Digital Charging Solutions]] \\ Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta of 25 April 2024, Case C‑60/23, Skatteverket v Digital Charging Solutions GmbH, ECLI:EU:C:2024:368
   * [[https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CC0547&from=nl|Dong Yang]] \\ Opinion of Advocate General Kokott of 14 November 2019, Case C-547/18, Dong Yang Electronics Sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej we Wrocławiu, ECLI:EU:C:2019:976
+  * [[https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62020CC0596|DuoDecad]] \\ Opinion of Advocate General Kokott of 10 February 2022, Case C-596/20 DuoDecad Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága, ECLI:EU:C:2022:91.
 ==E==
   * [[https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62019CC0335&from=en|E. Sp. z o.o. Sp. k.]] \\ Opinion of Advocate General Kokott of 4 June 2020, Case, C-335/19, E. Sp. z o.o. Sp. k. v Minister Finansów, ECLI:EU:C:2020:424
@@ Line 21: / Line 24: @@
 ==L==
   * [[https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62010CC0594&from=en|Laarhoven]] \\ Opinion of Advocate General Kokott, Case C-594/10, T.G. van Laarhoven v Staatssecretaris van Financiën, ECLI:EU:C:2011:820
+  * [[https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62023CC0087|LIKTA]] \\ Opinion of Advocate-General Kokott of 7 March 2024, Case C-87/23, Biedrība ‘Latvijas Informācijas un komunikācijas tehnoloģijas asociācija’ v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests, ECLI:EU:C:2024:222
 ==M==
 ==N==
@@ Line 30: / Line 34: @@
   * [[https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62017CC0249&from=en|Ryanair]] \\ Opinion of Advocate General Kokott of 3 May 2018, Case-249/17, Ryanair Ltd v The Revenue Commissioners, ECLI:EU:C:2018:301
 ==S==
+  * [[https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62019CC0042&qid=1703174978775|Sonaecom]] \\ Opinion of Advocate General of 14 May 2020, Case C-42/19 Sonaecom SGPS SA v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira, ECLI:EU:C:2020:378.
 ==T==
   * [[https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62016CC0396&from=en|T-2]] \\ Opinion of advocate general Saugmandsgaard ØE of 12 October 2017, Case C‑396/16, T — 2, družba za ustvarjanje, razvoj in trženje elektronskih komunikacij in opreme, d.o.o. (sedaj v stečaju) v Republic of Slovenia, ECLI:EU:C:2017:763
 ==U==
+  * [[https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62023CC0171|UP CAFFE]] \\ Opinion of Advocate-General Kokott of 16 May 2024, Case C-171/23, UP CAFFE d.o.o. v Ministarstvo financija Republike Hrvatske, ECLI:EU:C:2024:417
 ==V==
   * [[https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62007CC0515&from=en|VNLTO]] \\ Opinion of Advocate General Mengozzi of 22 December 2008, Case C‑515/07, Vereniging Noordelijke Land- en Tuinbouw Organisatie v Staatssecretaris van Financiën, ECLI:EU:C:2008:769
@@ Line 40: / Line 48: @@
 ==Y==
 ==Z==
-  * [[https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62020CC0156&from=en|Zipvit]] \\ Opinion of Advocate General Kokott of 8 July 2021, Case C-156/20, ECLI:EU:C:2021:558
+  * [[https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62020CC0156&from=en|Zipvit]] \\ Opinion of Advocate General Kokott of 8 July 2021, Case C-156/20, Zipvit Ltd v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs, ECLI:EU:C:2021:558
 ----