DokuWiki

Site Tools

Trace: • formuleringen_arresten • levering_onroerend_goed • maatstaf_combinaties_van_prestaties • reikwijdte_artikel_273_btw-rl • voorbeelden
bibliografie:hvj_en_conclusies

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
bibliografie:hvj_en_conclusies [2024/06/26 10:28] – [D] avdoesumbibliografie:hvj_en_conclusies [2025/03/07 15:22] (current) – [D] avdoesum
Line 9: Line 9:
   * [[https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62023CC0060|Digital Charging Solutions]] \\ Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta of 25 April 2024, Case C‑60/23, Skatteverket v Digital Charging Solutions GmbH, ECLI:EU:C:2024:368   * [[https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62023CC0060|Digital Charging Solutions]] \\ Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta of 25 April 2024, Case C‑60/23, Skatteverket v Digital Charging Solutions GmbH, ECLI:EU:C:2024:368
   * [[https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CC0547&from=nl|Dong Yang]] \\ Opinion of Advocate General Kokott of 14 November 2019, Case C-547/18, Dong Yang Electronics Sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej we Wrocławiu, ECLI:EU:C:2019:976   * [[https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CC0547&from=nl|Dong Yang]] \\ Opinion of Advocate General Kokott of 14 November 2019, Case C-547/18, Dong Yang Electronics Sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej we Wrocławiu, ECLI:EU:C:2019:976
 +  * [[https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62020CC0596|DuoDecad]] \\ Opinion of Advocate General Kokott of 10 February 2022, Case C-596/20 DuoDecad Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága, ECLI:EU:C:2022:91.
 ==E== ==E==
   * [[https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62019CC0335&from=en|E. Sp. z o.o. Sp. k.]] \\ Opinion of Advocate General Kokott of 4 June 2020, Case, C-335/19, E. Sp. z o.o. Sp. k. v Minister Finansów, ECLI:EU:C:2020:424   * [[https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62019CC0335&from=en|E. Sp. z o.o. Sp. k.]] \\ Opinion of Advocate General Kokott of 4 June 2020, Case, C-335/19, E. Sp. z o.o. Sp. k. v Minister Finansów, ECLI:EU:C:2020:424
Line 38: Line 39:
   * [[https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62016CC0396&from=en|T-2]] \\ Opinion of advocate general Saugmandsgaard ØE of 12 October 2017, Case C‑396/16, T — 2, družba za ustvarjanje, razvoj in trženje elektronskih komunikacij in opreme, d.o.o. (sedaj v stečaju) v Republic of Slovenia, ECLI:EU:C:2017:763   * [[https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62016CC0396&from=en|T-2]] \\ Opinion of advocate general Saugmandsgaard ØE of 12 October 2017, Case C‑396/16, T — 2, družba za ustvarjanje, razvoj in trženje elektronskih komunikacij in opreme, d.o.o. (sedaj v stečaju) v Republic of Slovenia, ECLI:EU:C:2017:763
 ==U== ==U==
 +
 +  * [[https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62023CC0171|UP CAFFE]] \\ Opinion of Advocate-General Kokott of 16 May 2024, Case C-171/23, UP CAFFE d.o.o. v Ministarstvo financija Republike Hrvatske, ECLI:EU:C:2024:417
 ==V== ==V==
   * [[https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62007CC0515&from=en|VNLTO]] \\ Opinion of Advocate General Mengozzi of 22 December 2008, Case C‑515/07, Vereniging Noordelijke Land- en Tuinbouw Organisatie v Staatssecretaris van Financiën, ECLI:EU:C:2008:769   * [[https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62007CC0515&from=en|VNLTO]] \\ Opinion of Advocate General Mengozzi of 22 December 2008, Case C‑515/07, Vereniging Noordelijke Land- en Tuinbouw Organisatie v Staatssecretaris van Financiën, ECLI:EU:C:2008:769
bibliografie/hvj_en_conclusies.1719390534.txt.gz · Last modified: by avdoesum