Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- karakter:neutraliteit [2021/07/01 13:53] – avdoesum
+++ karakter:neutraliteit [2026/08/13 07:20] (current) – removed - external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-=====Neutraliteit=====
-  - [[Neutraliteit#Aantekeningen|Aantekeningen]]
-  - [[Neutraliteit#Regelgeving|Regelgeving]]
-  - [[Neutraliteit#Jurisprudentie|Jurisprudentie]]
-  - [[Neutraliteit#Literatuur|Literatuur]]
-----
-====1.	Aantekeningen====
-----
-====2.	Regelgeving====
-----
-====3.	Jurisprudentie====
-[[https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/NL/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:61994CJ0155&from=nl|HvJ 20 juli 1996, zaak C-155/94 (Wellcome Trust), FED 1996/577]]
-“dit beginsel houdt (…) in, dat alle economische activiteiten gelijk moeten worden behandeld (…)’.
-[[https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/NL/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62017CJ0410&from=nl|A Oy, C‑410/17]]\\
-**37** It is clear from the same case-law that barter contracts, under which the consideration is by definition in kind, and transactions for which the consideration is in money are, **economically and commercially speaking**, two identical situations (judgment of 26 September 2013, Serebryannay vek, C‑283/12, EU:C:2013:599, paragraph 39 and the case-law cited).
-[[https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/NL/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0201&from=nl|Mydibel]]\\
-**47** In that regard, it suffices to observe that, in those circumstances, a taxable person who has entered into such a transaction not subject to VAT concerning a building which he owns is not, for VAT purposes, in a comparable situation to that of a taxable person who has remained the owner of a building without nterruption since the completion of the works which gave rise to the right to deduct input tax.
-----
-====4.	Literatuur====
-----