DokuWiki

You've loaded an old revision of the document! If you save it, you will create a new version with this data.

=====Rechtszekerheid=====
  - [[beginselen:Rechtszekerheid#Aantekeningen|Aantekeningen]]
  - [[beginselen:Rechtszekerheid#Regelgeving|Regelgeving]]
  - [[beginselen:Rechtszekerheid#Jurisprudentie|Jurisprudentie]]
  - [[beginselen:Rechtszekerheid#Literatuur|Literatuur]]

----

====1.	Aantekeningen====

* grote hoeveelheid HvJ jurisprudentie leidt tot rechtsonzekerheid en kosten. Zie Group on the future of VAT, minutes meeting 33, 16 October 2020, Taxud.c.1.(2020)7112886, GFV No 102 meeting 33, blz. 4

----

====2.	Regelgeving====

----

====3.	Jurisprudentie====

* [[https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62006CJ0308&from=en|Intertanko]] \\ CJEU 3 June 2008, Case C-308/06, The Queen, on the application of International Association of Independent Tanker Owners (Intertanko) and Others v Secretary of State for Transport, ECLI:EU:C:2008:312 \\ //This principle requires that a legal system and its application is clear and precise, so that individuals may ascertain unequivocally what their rights and obligations are and may take steps accordingly. CJEU 3 June 2008, Case C-308/06 Intertanko and others, ECLI: EU:C:2008:312, para. 69.//
  * [[https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:61997CJ0301&from=en|Commission v Netherlands]] \\ CJEU 22 November 2001, Case C-301/97, Kingdom of the Netherlands v Council of the European Union, ECLI:EU:C:2001:621 \\ //Further, it demands that EU VAT law (including CJEU case law) is certain and its application foreseeable by those subject to it//.
  * [[https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62002CJ0255&from=en|Halifax]] \\ CJEU 21 February 2006, Case C-255/02, Halifax plc, Leeds Permanent Development Services Ltd and County Wide Property Investments Ltd v Commissioners of Customs & Excise, ECLI:EU:C:2006:121, para. 72 \\ //72. However, as the Court has held on numerous occasions, Community legislation must be certain and its application foreseeable by those subject to it (see, in particular, Case C-301/97 Netherlands v Council [2001] ECR I-8853, paragraph 43). That requirement of legal certainty must be observed all the more strictly in the case of rules liable to entail financial consequences, in order that those concerned may know precisely the extent of the obligations which they impose on them (Case 326/85 Netherlands v Commission [1987] ECR 5091, paragraph 24, and Case C-17/01 Sudholz [2004] ECR I-4243, paragraph 34).//

----

====4.	Literatuur====

----

Edit summary

Note: By editing this page you agree to license your content under the following license: CC Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International